Thursday, November 11, 2010

Thinking about Acts 20

I’ve been thinking recently about Paul’s farewell speech to the Ephesian elders in Acts 20.  It is such a great Word for small group leaders!  Do read the whole chapter, but here are a few reflections:

From Miletus, Paul sent to Ephesus for the elders of the church.  When they arrived, he said to them: “You know how I lived the whole time I was with you, from the first day I came into the province of Asia.  I served the Lord with great humility and with tears and in the midst of severe testing by the plots of the Jews.  You know that I have not hesitated to preach anything that would be helpful to you but have taught you publicly and from house to house.  I have declared to both Jews and Greeks that they must turn to God in repentance and have faith in our Lord Jesus.  Acts 20:17-21

‘You know how I lived the whole time…’  Please notice that there was no escaping the examination of a life lived among his people.  So many of our conversations and interactions on Sundays can be fleeting, but not so in a small group meeting regularly in a home.  What a privilege to know our people and to be known by them.  What a great opportunity to live ‘real’ lives in community, with each other, as we really are and encourage each other along in our Christian walk.

‘I served the Lord with great humility and with tears…’  Please notice Paul’s passionate engagement with the Ephesians.  He serves God, but with tears as he serves them, amidst hardship and persecution.  Sometimes small group leadership can be challenging, but we remember Jesus who came not to be served, but to serve and give his life as a ransom for many (Mark 10:45).  So, like Jesus and like Paul, we serve with humility and a servant’s heart, through the joyous times and the times when tears are involved. 

‘You know that I have not hesitated to preach anything that would be helpful to you…  Please notice the absolute priority of teaching and declaring the truth of the Scriptures – especially here the Gospel message of repentance and forgiveness of sins.  Christian small groups are not the same as other social or common interest small groups.  The Pharisees complained that Jesus partied too much, but Jesus’ first act of public ministry was to say ‘The time has come.  The Kingdom of God is near.  Repent and believe the good news!’ (Mark 1:15).  The rest of the chapter speaks about how easy it is to slide away from this absolute priority.  It was easy then, and it is easy now to have as our focus something other than our deep need to keep repenting of our sins and turning to Jesus for forgiveness and the Spirit’s power to change us and mature us in Christ.

My prayer is that we might grow more and more into that sort of small group leader for the people of God.  

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Top Three Things

I can't remember where I first read this - I think it was a Phil Yancey book - but it came up in conversation again tonight with friends.  It goes like this:
In a large sample US survey of elderly retired persons with nothing to lose from being completely honest and frank, the question was asked, 'Now that you're close to the end of your lives, looking back, what would you have changed?'
The Top Three Things were:
1. I would have made more time for relationships.
2. I would have taken more risks in life. 
3. I would have done more things that lived on after I died. 
My summary of these is:
1. Relationships
2. Passions
3. Significance
It seems to me that these mirror closely the biblical perspective on the meaning and purpose of existence.
We have been created by a relational God for relationships.  And lives that prioritise career over family, or ambition over friendship, end up in a lonely bitter regretful place.  No one has ever said to me at their deathbed, 'I wish I spent more time at the office'. 
Lives that stick to 'safe' and 'secure' paths - the career trajectory, the expected and traditional route of financial security or job opportunity - can often be not just unadventurous, but ultimately a poor reflection of the person that God has gifted you to be.  What are the specific gifts, talents and passions the Lord has given you?  What decisions will you take to prioritise good stewardship of those?  Those decisions will often be contrary to the received wisdom of what a decent or safe career looks like.  No great adventurer, inventor or pioneer in their field was characterised by doing the non-risky career-advancing thing at the time. 
Ultimately, we each have the average three score years and ten.  But at the close, our thoughts turn to the matter of significance.  What has been the meaning of my life?  What achievement or legacy am I leaving behind?  What will live on, after my death?  Is the world a better place for my having passed through it?  
The remarkable thing about the Christian God is that He chooses to use us to achieve His eternal purposes.  So our lives can make a difference for eternal things.  Actually, it's the first two Things, Relationships and Passions, that make up the key components of any Significance that we might hope to have.  See the Parable of the Shrewd Manager in Luke 16 for example!  
Relationships.  Passions.  Significance.  I hope you know what your's are in your allotted three score years and ten.  

St Alfred's Contact post 21 October

Dear St Alfred's family

Often we hear that people are 'busy' or 'tired' or 'stressed'.  The same is true whether you're managing a household and children, in paid full-time work, or a member of the church staff team.  There are seasons of harder work, and seasons of rest.  So Peter is on holidays this week and I'm going on Saturday for my first 'away-from-home' break in 3 years!  (That's what doing doctoral research might do to you...)  I'm trying to repent of my sins! 

Maybe part of the reason I'm bad at holidays is because I have the great privilege of being paid to do something I love and am passionate about: telling people about Jesus and helping them grow in faith, hope and love. So what does a typical week look like for me?  Since Monday, I've:
- run a staff meeting 
- met separately with four great young adult leaders: two for mentoring, one for programme review, and one for discussion of a future Daniel sermon
- written three references of various sorts 
- read and thought more about Luke 15 in preparation for our evangelistic service on 31 Oct
- led our Wednesday morning communion service
- met with three different persons in a pastoral capacity at church
- paid a pastoral visit to a grieving family 
- lunched with a old friend struggling with a spiritual issue
- met with other staff members to catch up on pastoral care and teaching programme matters
- and numerous other phone calls, emails and other bits of work!

Today, I'm writing this email and helping Heather with Contact.  Soon I have to be off to Ridley where I might catch up over lunch with some of our young adults who are studying there today, before teaching my class in the afternoon.  

Who says ministry only happens on Sundays?! 

But ministry also isn't only what I do, or only what paid staff do.  My most important ministry happens whenever I get home.  Typically, as our automatic garage door rolls up and my car rolls in, the door to the house swings open and through the wound-up car windows I hear Alexandra crying out, 'Daddy's home!'  The energy each of us reserves for relationships - especially those closest to us, whether at home or at work or in our other contexts - is perhaps the most significant ministry we can be involved in. 

1 Peter 2:12 says, 'Live such good lives among the pagans that, though they accuse you of doing wrong, they may see your good deeds and glorify God on the day he visits us'.  

'Good lives' and 'good deeds' include the quality of our relationships - their integrity, love, faithfulness, hope, joy, gentleness, kindness and peaceableness.  God's Word is saying to us that these can have a direct impact on the pagan world, our Christian witness.  After all, if our lives are as chaotic, busy, stressed, 'no time for relationships', and devoid of eternal hope as everyone else's, then why would anyone bother with Jesus?  Our lives, the church's life and relationships must reflect the goodness and grace of the God.  How else are we to be salt and light? 

Well, this is a tremendous challenge to me, but thanks be to our gracious Lord Jesus!  God promises us wisdom for life and ministry, as we pray for it; and also the power to change by his Holy Spirit.  
  
Looking forward to seeing you again soon. 

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Being Missional May Hurt Your Church

Here's a re-blog from http://theresurgence.com/2010/10/10/being-missional-may-kill-your-church
I didn't like the 'kill' language - why do people have to be so extreme in their statements?  Can't they trust that we'll pay attention if they have a good idea?  Anyway... enough with the gripe.  Here's the quote that I thought we could think about together:
In Breaking the Missional Code, Ed Stetzer explains how the church has shifted to missional thinking in the following way:
  • From programs to processes
  • From demographics to discernment
  • From models to missions
  • From attractional to incarnational
  • From uniformity to diversity
  • From professional to passionate
  • From seating to sending
  • From decisions to disciples
  • From additional to exponential
  • From monuments to movements

Wednesday, October 06, 2010

Surprising Insights: More on Unchurched-Reaching Pastors

OK, so I’ve been away a long time.  Blogging is a bit like that.  Let me continue my review of Rainer’s research findings.  Chapter Eight is entitled ‘What makes these Leaders Tick?’  What struck me most about this chapter was the clear emphasis on evangelism and theology.  
Rainer described four key motivational factors in these effective pastors:
  1. a theology of lostness - they are personally and deeply convinced that people without Christ are lost and feel it emotionally too. 
  2. passion and enthusiasm - especially for personally modelling evangelism
  3. accountability in personal evangelism
  4. excellence in all things - as Rainer observes elsewhere, excellence is intrinsically attractive
The chapter also lists 15 other lessons and features, well worth pondering, but I’m still getting over the emphasis on the need to model evangelism personally.  I’ve committed to that over several years, but I guess the question I’m asking now is if I’m doing enough.  Hm.  Any comments? 

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Local housing affordability and our church

Blackburn North is in the 'Bible-belt' of Melbourne's eastern suburbs - but there's evidence that the 'belt' is already moving further out. How do we maintain a Christian witness in our area and realise a good long-term return on the substantial investment we've put into our new St Alfred's church buildings? 
Larger Christian congregations have tended to be where young families and affordable housing have been, but church buildings have often lagged behind church growth. This means that by the time funds are raised, and a facility is built, young families have already begun shifting away as the area becomes too expensive. This is part of the reason why there are so many (in their day full and expensive to build) church buildings in the inner east of Melbourne that are largely under-utilised today.  
The same sort of predicament faces government planners who have to decide where to put schools and other public facilities.  
Some time ago I wrote this paper for my local church community: tell me if you found it helpful, or if you disagree!  

Tuesday, July 06, 2010

Surprising Insights: Profile of Unchurched-Reaching Pastors

Apologies for the long-ish silence!
Chapter Seven takes us in to Part Two of the book.  Having surveyed the recently unchurched and heard the overwhelming importance of the role of the pastor/ minister/ leader, Rainer undertook a second round of interviews.  He surveyed 101 pastors of churches who are reaching the unchurched.  
Those surveyed came from churches across a range of denominations (but no significant percentage (if any) were Episcopalians/ Anglicans), age groups, ethnic backgrounds, social settings, and church ages (ie. local churches from less than 10 to more than 100 years old).  
A number of findings are summarised in this chapter:
  1. Interview results from the 101 pastors have a statistically highly consistent degree of correlation with the results of the main survey of recently unchurched. 
  2. Their average tenure was 11.8 years, compared to just 3.8 for all pastors.
  3. 87% were seminary trained (47% had masters/ seminary training, 40% had doctorates).
  4. An unquantifiable passion for reaching the lost and unchurched world was evident through the interviews.
  5. Leaders are readers - the top book cited was Rick Warren’s ‘The Purpose Driven Life’ followed by Oswald Chambers’ ‘My Utmost for His Highest’ and J. I. Packer’s ‘Knowing God’.
  6. Preaching - biblical preaching - was an absolute priority.  
  7. They tended to be theologically conservative: 99% affirmed that salvation is only through Christ, 98% held to the inerrancy (complete or limited) of the Bible.  
  8. They desired to be better leaders: through reading books on leadership, undertaking further study, formalising a mentoring relationship with another leader, seeking to upgrade skills in new areas like finance or administration. 
  9. Having an intentional plan to reach the unchurched, and executing on it, was critical. 
  10. Personal holiness, integrity, leadership by example, a vibrant prayer life, personal Bible study, ability to institute change, ability to cast vision, Bible knowledge, personal evangelism and communication skills were, in order, the top ten personal characteristics as rated in relation to leading their local church.  
That’s quite a list!  And knowing something about how difficult it is for many local churches in Melbourne to find a pastor when they need a new one, this list makes me want to keep praying that the Lord of the harvest raises up more workers for His harvest field. 
If you’re in need of a pastor, I think this list suggests that you either look to a good theological college, or find the most godly and capable person you can to send to one.  It takes a while to cook them properly, so we’d best start sending them now!
If you’re a pastor already or wanting to be one, be encouraged!  Here are some ways forward from this study.  If you haven’t already, start working on your personal holiness; preach the Bible; find a godly leader to be a mentor; start reading; start praying and planning. 

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Feeling stressed out by life?

Some years ago I had reason to write this little pamphlet, which I've never regretted.  I keep explaining it and giving it away to people, so why not put it on the web as well?

Here's the link:
http://bit.ly/bjjNqE

Do let me know if you find it useful, or if you've got feedback for me.  And please do feel free to use it in your ministry to others.  God's blessings!

ps. Hey, since posting this just last week, I received a copy of Luke's Journal, the rag of the Christian Medical and Dental Fellowship (Australia).  They've published this!  And I think I gave them permission... ages ago.  Hope their readers find it helpful.

Friday, June 18, 2010

Breaking the 500 barrier

Nelson Searcy is a pastor in New York City, has worked on staff at Saddleback with Rick Warren and is a church leadership consultant.  http://www.churchleaderinsights.com
I’ve been listening to a Searcy audio talk on churches ‘breaking the 500 barrier’.  It’s widely acknowledged that churches approaching that size of membership need to overcome several cultural changes to grow beyond 500.  (Of course another option is to send off a portion of the congregation to a church plant, and stay below 500.)
Here are four bits from his introduction which I took note of:
  1. Change is essential - with optimism and faith in God - to break through 500. 
  2. Ask, ‘What is keeping my church from growing?’
  3. Go from ‘good’ to ‘great’.
  4. Move ‘occasional attenders’ of church to become ‘committed attenders’. 
These overlap nicely with what I’ve seen in Surprising Insights.  I noted the observation there that  excellence is intrinsically attractive.  If we’re determined to serve God with excellence, we’ll change some things that we do at church presently.  

The direction of change that I’m interested in is change for growth.   So I’m already asking, ‘What’s keeping us from growing?’  We’re already doing many things well, but how do we go from ‘good to great’, and in which areas first?  Moving occasionals to becoming committed attenders is certainly a top priority!  (I sometimes call it ‘discipleship’.)

Monday, June 07, 2010

Surprising Insights #7 - Doctrine Really Matters


This is the final chapter in Part One, which deals with results from the survey of 353 formally unchurched persons.  True to the title of the book, the counter-intuitive finding is that doctrine really matters to the unchurched.  
The highest scoring factor influencing choice of church was theological beliefs or doctrine.  Interestingly, this factor was slightly more important for the formerly unchurched (91%) than for the control group of transfer churched (89%).  
Four headings in the chapter caught my attention:
Looking for absolutes:  the qualitative comments from the survey indicated that the unchurched were looking for absolute values in a world filled with uncertainty and the proliferation of relativism.  They picked it up not just from the sermons, but also in publications where the church’s doctrinal position was clearly set out.
Sensing certitude: certitude is the conviction of belief, which was also attractive and convincing.  One remarked, ‘there are a lot of wishy-washy churches out there’, and another said of the pastor, ‘this guy really believes this stuff’.  
Pastor, doctrine and certitude: Pastors who were unafraid to deal with difficult doctrinal issues also stood out in the remarks.  Their clarity and conviction was refreshing, and carried across not just in the pulpit but across a range of contexts like a welcomers’ gathering and Bible study class. 
Speaking the truth in love: Above all the grace, warmth and love communicated by not just the pastor, but the entire congregation as they held on their doctrinal clarity, was attractive and convincing.  

Wednesday, June 02, 2010

Surprising Insights #6 - Closing the Back Door

Well, that’s what I would have titled Chapter 5, instead of ‘Why They Returned and Stayed’.  Rainer opens the chapter with the burning issue a senior minister of a large and expanding church was wrestling with: low retention rates among newcomers.  The study of 353 formerly unchurched persons produced 6 key factors for retaining newcomers and encouraging return visits among guests:


1. Doctrine clarified
There is a desperately intriguing sentence in this section: ‘In a culture that prides itself on religious pluralism, we found that perhaps millions of Americans are on a quest for objective truth’.  I’m not so sure about the average Australian’s confidence that there is such a thing to be found - but I’d be very happy to be corrected!


2. High expectations
‘People have no desire to be a part of something that makes no difference, that expects little.  And, frankly, many churches have dumbed down church membership to the point that is has no meaning at all.’  Rainer combines results from an earlier survey of 2000 churches and concludes emphatically that churches with high and clear expectations of members to commit to living and ministering in a way consistent with New Testament teachings are better at evangelism and retaining guests (as members).


3. An “entry point” class
By this Rainer means a class or session for new members or potential new members in which the culture and identity of the church, and the expectations of members, are communicated and clarified.  This is typically done by the senior minister.   Further there was a positive correlation between the rate of retention of new members, and the requirement of attending such a class.  The more ‘optional’ the classes were, the lower the rate of retention.  

4. Small groups or Sunday School 
Forming meaningful relationships is the critical factor in retaining new members.  And involvement in a small group or a ministry area are the two most effective contexts in which those relationships form.  The study found an overwhelming correlation between membership of a small group or a Sunday School class and forming a long-lasting commitment to the local church.  
For some new converts, a Sunday School option was preferable, as it kept church involvement to a Sunday and decreased potential resentment from non-church going family members - a factor that I’d not considered more seriously before.  
‘Busyness’ is a common catch-cry these days, but this observation is not dissimilar to the narrative argument in Tim Chester and Steve Timms, Total Church - relationships matter, and relationships and community-building take time and energy and a degree of prioritisation over other competing demands.


5. Clarity of purpose
More than 90% of laity in evangelistic churches can name 4 out of 5 of their church’s purpose statements.  The figure for non-evangelistic churches is 17.7%.  Full-stop!


6. Ministry involvement
When asked what kept them ‘active in church’, 62% of the study’s respondents mentioned some form of ministry involvement.  55% mentioned the Sunday School - what we would call the Bible study small group.  But it was ministry involvement that generated enthusiastic, ‘eyes lighting up’ responses.  

So in summary, the formerly unchurched want to be in a church that makes a difference, that has clear direction and vision.  And they want to be in small groups, and serve in ministry - and they want to do this in a church that sets a high bar on what it means to be a Christian and church member today.  

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Surprising Insights #5: Impressed by First Impressions

I’ll never forget a story a colleague told me about going to church in a small Victorian country town where she and a friend were holidaying.  They found the local Anglican church on Sunday, and went in at service time.  The place was mainly empty, so they picked a pew and slid in.  The first person to talk to them was an elderly lady who came over and said grumpily, ‘You’re sitting in my spot’.  
This chapter discusses the study’s findings that first impressions matter.  Interestingly, most respondents were more affected by the impressions on their second visit, rather than their first.  But they had decided within a few minutes of their first visit as to whether they would come back or not.  Many put it down to being overwhelmed by everything first time around.  
Be that as it may, the point is that the formerly unchurched notice things about both people and facilities that influence their decision to return.  There wasn’t much about this in the chapter, but I rather suspect that the transfer churched are fussier about things like worship and music preference. 
The study showed that the top five first impressions had to do with:
  1. Friendliness - 311
  2. Nice facilities/ adequate space -161
  3. Nursery/ preschool/ children’s ministry - 102
  4. Organisation (instead of chaos) - 111
  5. Greeters and welcome centres - 117
The numbers refer to the number of respondents (out of the study total of 353) who mentioned this factor as a positive towards their decision to return and eventually join the church.  
Rainer rightly discusses the impact of consumerism and the consumer mentality on churches.  Two or three generations ago church was where you went locally to serve others.  Now visitors ask what the church can do for them, or their children.  He acknowledges that it is difficult to draw the line between being seeker-friendly and driven by consumerism, but uses the example of one outstandingly evangelistically successful church as the paradigm: excellence is what matters.  ‘Mediocrity breeds indifference, but excellence attracts…’ says that church’s pastor.  So even if you’re starting a church in a dingy rented living room, with no children’s ministry, you should be encouraged to strive for excellence in the service and in quality of your friendly welcoming fellowship.  

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Surprising Insights #4: Relationships that Click

This is a really interesting chapter.  Rainer cites a number of other studies which indicate that relationships are highly significant for people connecting to a church.  The received wisdom is that relationships matter, but in this chapter he outlines this particular study’s surprising findings.  The methodological nuances take a bit of careful thought to get through, but they’re worth it!  
Two significant differences between this study’s and other studies’ findings are identified.  1. The reasons the formerly unchurched chose a particular church are complex and cannot be simplified to one or two major issues.  2. Relationships is an important factor, but not the overwhelming reason as some other studies suggest.  
Five major conclusions are outlined:
  1. Relationships Are Very Important
  2. Rarely Do Relationships Alone Explain the Best Way to Reach the Unchurched
  3. God Sometimes Works to Reach the Unchurched Without Using Any Relationships
  4. Family Relationships Are the Most Important
  5. The Wife is the Most Important Relationship in Reaching the Unchurched
The formerly unchurched were asked, ‘If a family member influenced you to come to church, which person was most influential?’  The highest score was 35% - ‘wives’.  The next highest was 18% - ‘children’ and then 16% for ‘other’.  Parents, siblings and parents-in-law returned 9, 5 and 2%.  Husbands didn’t even score. 
Rainer observes that women are, on anecdotal evidence, more likely to visit a church without any relational connection, whereas men are not likely to visit a church where they do not know anybody.  
The end result, in my opinion, is that women tend to be over-represented in churches.  The good news is that wives are such an important relationship for reaching unchurched husbands - one third of respondents!  So, how many churches do you know about with an intentional ministry to help wives reach their unconverted husbands?  St Alfred’s doesn’t have one… yet. 

Five Books for Budding Theologians

A friend just asked me to recommend five books for people beginning to consider theological studies, or who are becoming interested in theology. Here's my reply:  
1. ESV Study Bible - because the Bible is where we start and this one has seriously helpful theologically-rigorous notes (and pictures, I like pictures)  
2. Knowing God - J. I. Packer - because theology is the study of God, and knowing God can never be reduced to an intellectual exercise: if it is, you've failed  
3. Understanding Doctrine - Alister McGrath - because it's always helpful to have a gutsy quick-read overview of orthodox Christian belief  
4. The Story of Christianity - Justo Gonzalez - because theology is embedded in a historical context and it's humbling to see that you're not the first person to ask that intriguing question (and we remember stories)  
5. New Dictionary of Biblical Theology/ Theology - IVP - because most people come to theological reflection with a specific issue or question to begin with, and these tomes allow you start where you want and then follow the links to read-your-own theological adventure
BTW, I've put in links above to some really interesting sites where you can begin reading theology online. 
Cheers! And happy reading and knowing God.

Saturday, May 22, 2010

Surprising Insights #3: Pastors and Preaching are Critical

Rainer gives two reasons why he was hesitant to publish this chapter.  
Firstly, earlier research on four thousand churches in the USA showed that a majority were abandoning the biblical model of pastoral ministry: that is, a commitment to Acts 6:4 and a model of leadership that allowed pastors to focus on ministry of the Word and prayer.  
Secondly, he feared that many readers would use this material to say that the reason their churches weren’t growing was inept pastoring - when in fact his research shows that ‘pastors are among the hardest working and yet least respected persons in America today’. 
But publish the chapter he did, because the ‘pastor and preaching’ factor was found to be so outstandingly critical to evangelistically effective churches.  97% of respondents answered ‘Yes’ to the question ‘Did the pastor and the preaching play a part in your coming to this church?‘  Asked a more open-ended question about factors that led to respondents choosing their church, ‘pastors or preaching’ were mentioned in 90% of cases, ‘doctrine’ in 88% and the next most mentioned factor was ‘friendliness’ at 49%.  
Around ‘pastors and preaching’ there were 8 statistically significant characteristics:
  1. preaching that teaches the Bible - by which is meant expository or ‘line-by-line’ Bible teaching (as one respondent described it. 
  2. preaching that applies to my life
  3. authenticity of the pastor - down-to-earth, friendly, willing to admit mistakes, real, regular guy
  4. pastor’s conviction - of the truth and the importance of it
  5. personal contact by the pastor
  6. pastor is a good communicator
  7. pastor is a leader - especially with regard to the vision and purpose and direction of the church
  8. pastor’s class - by which is meant an introductory class to the church, or a church membership class that is taken by the senior pastor. 
Each of these eight are described in more detail in this chapter, which ends with a word of encouragement for pastors - for it does seem that a ‘superman pastor’ is what is required!  Rainer notes that in a previous study he discovered that a majority of pastors spend around two hours a week on sermon preparation.  That staggered me, I need most of the week whenever I’m preaching!  So he concludes that making a few decisions about the relative importance of preaching and teaching, the ministry of Word and prayer, can yield great fruit in a pastor’s ministry.  That’s not a bad conclusion, nor a bad word of encouragement.  

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

The Attentive Life

Ok, I have to admit that I’m only reading this book because I have to.  I’m part of a peer mentoring community that meets in a retreat setting for five days annually.  Each year we read a book together on the spiritual life, and our reading reflections become an important part of our time together.  
Leighton Ford is Billy Graham’s brother-in-law, and at the time of my writing both men are advanced in years, but still alive and relatively well.  Leighton was part of the Billy Graham evangelistic team that proclaimed the Gospel to literally millions of people across the globe over the latter half of the last century.    
As an evangelist, Leighton’s life has been about being busy “making friends for God”, as he puts it.  It was, by any account, a hectic frantic frenetic existence flying from city to city to preach, teach and speak as an itinerant evangelist.  In the latter part of his life, the commitment to evangelism remains, but he also wants to attend to his own heart and to deepen his own friendship with God; he uses the language of paying attention to God’s presence in all things.  This is the prime concern of this book. 
It’s not the usual kind of book that I read, or that the people in my mentoring group might read either.  But  it so happens that Leighton Ford is effectively the grandfather of our group, which has been ‘grandfathered’ out of an original mentoring group assembled by him some decades ago.  So I guess we owe it to him! 
The chapters are structured around prayers of the hours, or the Divine Hours, a cycle of eight prayer times through the day (and night!) in the Rule of St. Benedict.  This medieval monastic order or rule of life, has experienced something of a postmodern renaissance as Christians seek release and a sense of order within the chaotic activity of the pressure and stress-packed technological world.  
In each chapter Ford offers his reflection on the particular prayer in the cycle, provides an exemplar of ‘one who paid attention’ to God, and notes a helpful practice or two for paying attention ourselves.  It is written in an easy first-person narrative style.  Sort of like a fire-side chat with your favourite grandfather, only it is mainly a monologue, and there are bits where you have to work hard to stop, reflect, pay attention to what is really being said... pay attention to what God might be saying. 
I don’t think there can really ever be any replacement to reflecting on the Bible and what God is saying and teaching us through the Scriptures, but I’ve really valued how this book and these kinds of books force me to think and experience things outside the square of my default spirituality.  Like great poetry, of which Leighton is fond, moments in this book catch you unawares, and you are better for it. 

Sunday, May 16, 2010

TEC consecrates practising lesbian bishop

Well, it was always going to happen.

Some of you know that I went to GAFCON - the Global Anglican Futures Conference - two years ago.  It was a massive gathering of people representing the vast majority of the world's Anglicans, who view Jesus as the Son of God who died for the sins of the world, and who combine that faith in Jesus Christ with a high view of the Bible's authority - and who incidentally are still growing by evangelism and conversion.  In other words, they were recognisably Christian using any of the classic historical definitions of the faith.

Contrast the Anglican Church in the USA, otherwise known as 'The Episcopal Church' (which in itself tells us something about their self-superior mindset!).  This article from The Age inaccurately describes Mary Glasspool's 'consecration' as an 'ordination', but otherwise provides a look at the issue. What is at stake here is not just a Church's views on human sexuality, but an entire shift in the meaning of Christian identity - and the source of that identity.

TEC believes that the historic formularies of the Christian faith, including its teaching on the person and work of Christ, the authority of the Scriptures, and human sexuality, are all unfixed and open to change.  They are, to TEC, in a state of progressive change, depending (largely) on the latest reflections from human wisdom and experience.

By contrast, orthodox Christians and Anglicans are committed to the Bible as God's rule of faith, and the source of 'all things necessary for life and salvation'.  The central message of the Bible is 'the eternal Gospel', as unchanging as God is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow.  Yes, the Scriptures are subject to interpretation - that is why we need well trained pastors and teachers who submit themselves to the discipline of biblical studies - but their job is to interpret the meaning and application of the 'faith delivered once for all' to a changing context.

The difference is vitally important. If you put human thinking and reason in first spot, you will inevitably end up moving with the philosophical fashion of the times. But if you put Scripture first, duly interpreted and worked through, there will always be a sense in which you will be 'in the world but not of the world'. It's an uncomfortable spot, but then Jesus Christ did get himself crucified for occupying just such a position.

I've just heard Glasspool speak on the BBC News saying that she invites people who disagree with her to meet with her, for, she says, 'I am a reconciling person'. It's a nice sentiment, but she conveniently ignores the entire history of TEC moving in a direction contrary to numerous discussions and protests dating back more than a decade. She and her Church ignored the Archbishop of Canterbury's strong warning against proceeding with the consecration.  It was hardly a conciliatory move to the rest of the Anglican Church to do so today. We can only expect TEC and its sympathisers to be further marginalised from the rest of orthodox Anglicanism (and to be outraged at the same time).

Other commentators, for those who are seriously interested:
David Virtue
Global South Anglican - a coalition of majority world Anglicans
Anglican TV
Anglican Mainstream -
The Bishop of Tasmania has made a strong comment here and provides more links on his page.

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Surprising Insights - 9 Myths about the Unchurched - Pt II

Myth #6 The pastor must be a dynamic and charismatic leader for the church to reach the unchurched
Only 4% of the churches in the USA meet the definition of evangelistically-effective laid out for this study.  Of these, most of the pastors are not the mega-star ones whose names evangelical Christians would be familiar with.  Pastoral leadership was such an important factor that the entire latter half of the book deals with this.   
Myth #6 We must be careful in our teaching and preaching so that we do not communicate deep and complex biblical truths that will confuse the unchurched
91% of respondents indicated that doctrine was important in their decision to choose the church to join.  Interestingly, this was a slightly higher percentage than the 89% of transfer churched respondents (ie. Christians who transferred their membership).  My observation is that the world is not a simple place, and people - churched or unchurched - are looking for robust and coherent, not simplistic, answers.  
Myth #7 The Sunday School and other small groups are ineffective in attracting the unchurched
By Sunday School the study means the practice of holding Bible study classes on Sunday afternoons, after the morning service.  These often take the place of our mid-week Bible study small groups.  The Sunday School is for all age groups, highly organised, and syllabus driven.  They are, in effect, a means of providing Bible teaching in an organised age-appropriate setting.  An Australian equivalent might be the parachurch Bible Study Fellowship or a Bible overview course run in a local church.  
Myth #8 The most important evangelistic relationships take place in the marketplace
By marketplace the study means the place we spend most of our working time: work, university, school, neighborhoods, shops.  We might spend most of our time in the ‘marketplace’ but it ranks poorly as a fertile place for evangelism. 
When asked who was most significant in influencing their decision to come to church, the formerly unchurched ranked family members highest at 43%.  Next, in order, came ‘No one’ (25%), ‘Other’ (17%), ‘Coworker’ (8%), ‘Neighbour’ (6%) then ‘Merchant’ (2%).  Familial relationships were far and away the most significant.  
Of family relationships, wives were far and away the most significant (35%), children next (18%) then parents (9%) and siblings (5%).  Parents-in-law (2%) and other relations (9%) complete the list.  Husbands barely ranked.  
What this tells us is that marketplace evangelism is extremely difficult for a variety of reasons that we might speculate about.  It also indicates that churches would do well to develop an intentional strategy of equipping wives to evangelise their husbands.  
Myth #9 The unchurched are concerned only about their own needs
The study showed that the motivation of the unchurched for seeking out church or religious influence is complex and varied.  One-in-three respondents indicated that the desire to have religious influence in their children’s lives was the main factor for them.  Many also indicated altruistic motives, the desire to be challenged to make a difference.  
Some preaching tends to denigrate and condemn ‘the world’ and the unchurched, when in reality there is sin both inside and outside the church.  I’ve found that people appreciate it when I point this out in my preaching and teaching, and when I affirm what I can in the world while passionately defending my conviction that Jesus is the pinnacle of all wisdom and altruism and service.
Great MythBusting!  I’m looking forward to the rest of the book!  

Friday, May 14, 2010

Surprising Insights - 9 Myths about the Unchurched - Pt I

Here's a summary of the next chapter in the book. 

Myth #1 Most unchurched think and act like Anglo, middle-class suburbanites with no church background
The study shows that the unchurched are a diverse group, and that people come into church for a variety of reasons from a variety of backgrounds.  We must not fall into the trap of stereotyping the unchurched.  
Myth #2 The unchurched are turned off by denominational names in the church name
Church names rank incredibly low on the range of factors influencing the unchurched to join.  81% of respondents say it did not influence their decision.  8% were uncertain and of the 11% who said the name influence their decision, two-thirds said that the denominational name was a positive influence.  This is probably less true in Australia, but worth investigating further.  If my local church is any guide, there is plenty of local community goodwill and lots of people who have a basically positive view of St Alfred's Anglican Church.  
Myth #3 The unchurched never attend church
On average the unchurched attend around one or two times a year.  The book highlights Christmas and Easter, but we might add baptisms, weddings and funerals as well.  Rainer says, 'Visitors do come - are we ready for them?'  In my experience, this is desperately correct!  Unchurched visitors come to a church for a variety of reasons, not least because someone they trust invites them.

Myth #4 The unchurched cannot be reached by direct personal evangelism
There is plenty of testimony from the interviewees of the impact of a personal visit from the pastor or a visiting team from the church, in which direct evangelism occurred, leading to conversion and their joining the church.  In the majority of stories recorded the visit happened within a month of their visit to the church (and presumably filling out a visitor’s card).  Of course we only hear the success stories - there would have been many failures.  By one calculation only 1 in 5000 who heard Whitfield and Wesley preach were converted.  It is my observation that our contemporary fear of rejection and public shame is the main thing that keeps us from proclaiming the Good News in season and out of season.    



  


Monday, May 10, 2010

How did you learn how to do 'Christian'?

In a recent mentoring meeting with someone, the conversation moved to how we learn how to do 'Christian' as a way of life. How do we learn Christian spirituality, behaviour, cultural norms, prayer, habits of church attendance, singing, speech, etc. etc. etc. etc.?  How did you?

The theological answer, depending on your inclination, is something like 'from church tradition' or 'from the Bible'. The practical answer is often 'from your mentors and peers'. Prayer, for example, is more often 'caught' than 'taught' - we imitate forms and fashions of prayer, rather than practice what we might read in a textbook.

That's why it's one thing to say that prayer is important and ought to happen and even preach it - and quite another to model prayerfulness and to model Scripture-soaked, wise, discerning, effective, humble, entreating, God-glorifying, Christ-centred, Spirit-impassioned prayer.

That's also why it's important to be formed both by the Scriptures and by Scripture-soaked exemplars.

What's true of the school of prayer, is true of the school of Christian living. We learn from the Bible, but we are also formed by the Christians around us. You can't have one without the other.  And both are less than fully effective without the other. So I hope that those of us who are doing 'Christian' have this double commitment in our hearts and minds: to God's Word and God's people.