Thursday, May 27, 2010

Surprising Insights #5: Impressed by First Impressions

I’ll never forget a story a colleague told me about going to church in a small Victorian country town where she and a friend were holidaying.  They found the local Anglican church on Sunday, and went in at service time.  The place was mainly empty, so they picked a pew and slid in.  The first person to talk to them was an elderly lady who came over and said grumpily, ‘You’re sitting in my spot’.  
This chapter discusses the study’s findings that first impressions matter.  Interestingly, most respondents were more affected by the impressions on their second visit, rather than their first.  But they had decided within a few minutes of their first visit as to whether they would come back or not.  Many put it down to being overwhelmed by everything first time around.  
Be that as it may, the point is that the formerly unchurched notice things about both people and facilities that influence their decision to return.  There wasn’t much about this in the chapter, but I rather suspect that the transfer churched are fussier about things like worship and music preference. 
The study showed that the top five first impressions had to do with:
  1. Friendliness - 311
  2. Nice facilities/ adequate space -161
  3. Nursery/ preschool/ children’s ministry - 102
  4. Organisation (instead of chaos) - 111
  5. Greeters and welcome centres - 117
The numbers refer to the number of respondents (out of the study total of 353) who mentioned this factor as a positive towards their decision to return and eventually join the church.  
Rainer rightly discusses the impact of consumerism and the consumer mentality on churches.  Two or three generations ago church was where you went locally to serve others.  Now visitors ask what the church can do for them, or their children.  He acknowledges that it is difficult to draw the line between being seeker-friendly and driven by consumerism, but uses the example of one outstandingly evangelistically successful church as the paradigm: excellence is what matters.  ‘Mediocrity breeds indifference, but excellence attracts…’ says that church’s pastor.  So even if you’re starting a church in a dingy rented living room, with no children’s ministry, you should be encouraged to strive for excellence in the service and in quality of your friendly welcoming fellowship.  

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Surprising Insights #4: Relationships that Click

This is a really interesting chapter.  Rainer cites a number of other studies which indicate that relationships are highly significant for people connecting to a church.  The received wisdom is that relationships matter, but in this chapter he outlines this particular study’s surprising findings.  The methodological nuances take a bit of careful thought to get through, but they’re worth it!  
Two significant differences between this study’s and other studies’ findings are identified.  1. The reasons the formerly unchurched chose a particular church are complex and cannot be simplified to one or two major issues.  2. Relationships is an important factor, but not the overwhelming reason as some other studies suggest.  
Five major conclusions are outlined:
  1. Relationships Are Very Important
  2. Rarely Do Relationships Alone Explain the Best Way to Reach the Unchurched
  3. God Sometimes Works to Reach the Unchurched Without Using Any Relationships
  4. Family Relationships Are the Most Important
  5. The Wife is the Most Important Relationship in Reaching the Unchurched
The formerly unchurched were asked, ‘If a family member influenced you to come to church, which person was most influential?’  The highest score was 35% - ‘wives’.  The next highest was 18% - ‘children’ and then 16% for ‘other’.  Parents, siblings and parents-in-law returned 9, 5 and 2%.  Husbands didn’t even score. 
Rainer observes that women are, on anecdotal evidence, more likely to visit a church without any relational connection, whereas men are not likely to visit a church where they do not know anybody.  
The end result, in my opinion, is that women tend to be over-represented in churches.  The good news is that wives are such an important relationship for reaching unchurched husbands - one third of respondents!  So, how many churches do you know about with an intentional ministry to help wives reach their unconverted husbands?  St Alfred’s doesn’t have one… yet. 

Five Books for Budding Theologians

A friend just asked me to recommend five books for people beginning to consider theological studies, or who are becoming interested in theology. Here's my reply:  
1. ESV Study Bible - because the Bible is where we start and this one has seriously helpful theologically-rigorous notes (and pictures, I like pictures)  
2. Knowing God - J. I. Packer - because theology is the study of God, and knowing God can never be reduced to an intellectual exercise: if it is, you've failed  
3. Understanding Doctrine - Alister McGrath - because it's always helpful to have a gutsy quick-read overview of orthodox Christian belief  
4. The Story of Christianity - Justo Gonzalez - because theology is embedded in a historical context and it's humbling to see that you're not the first person to ask that intriguing question (and we remember stories)  
5. New Dictionary of Biblical Theology/ Theology - IVP - because most people come to theological reflection with a specific issue or question to begin with, and these tomes allow you start where you want and then follow the links to read-your-own theological adventure
BTW, I've put in links above to some really interesting sites where you can begin reading theology online. 
Cheers! And happy reading and knowing God.

Saturday, May 22, 2010

Surprising Insights #3: Pastors and Preaching are Critical

Rainer gives two reasons why he was hesitant to publish this chapter.  
Firstly, earlier research on four thousand churches in the USA showed that a majority were abandoning the biblical model of pastoral ministry: that is, a commitment to Acts 6:4 and a model of leadership that allowed pastors to focus on ministry of the Word and prayer.  
Secondly, he feared that many readers would use this material to say that the reason their churches weren’t growing was inept pastoring - when in fact his research shows that ‘pastors are among the hardest working and yet least respected persons in America today’. 
But publish the chapter he did, because the ‘pastor and preaching’ factor was found to be so outstandingly critical to evangelistically effective churches.  97% of respondents answered ‘Yes’ to the question ‘Did the pastor and the preaching play a part in your coming to this church?‘  Asked a more open-ended question about factors that led to respondents choosing their church, ‘pastors or preaching’ were mentioned in 90% of cases, ‘doctrine’ in 88% and the next most mentioned factor was ‘friendliness’ at 49%.  
Around ‘pastors and preaching’ there were 8 statistically significant characteristics:
  1. preaching that teaches the Bible - by which is meant expository or ‘line-by-line’ Bible teaching (as one respondent described it. 
  2. preaching that applies to my life
  3. authenticity of the pastor - down-to-earth, friendly, willing to admit mistakes, real, regular guy
  4. pastor’s conviction - of the truth and the importance of it
  5. personal contact by the pastor
  6. pastor is a good communicator
  7. pastor is a leader - especially with regard to the vision and purpose and direction of the church
  8. pastor’s class - by which is meant an introductory class to the church, or a church membership class that is taken by the senior pastor. 
Each of these eight are described in more detail in this chapter, which ends with a word of encouragement for pastors - for it does seem that a ‘superman pastor’ is what is required!  Rainer notes that in a previous study he discovered that a majority of pastors spend around two hours a week on sermon preparation.  That staggered me, I need most of the week whenever I’m preaching!  So he concludes that making a few decisions about the relative importance of preaching and teaching, the ministry of Word and prayer, can yield great fruit in a pastor’s ministry.  That’s not a bad conclusion, nor a bad word of encouragement.  

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

The Attentive Life

Ok, I have to admit that I’m only reading this book because I have to.  I’m part of a peer mentoring community that meets in a retreat setting for five days annually.  Each year we read a book together on the spiritual life, and our reading reflections become an important part of our time together.  
Leighton Ford is Billy Graham’s brother-in-law, and at the time of my writing both men are advanced in years, but still alive and relatively well.  Leighton was part of the Billy Graham evangelistic team that proclaimed the Gospel to literally millions of people across the globe over the latter half of the last century.    
As an evangelist, Leighton’s life has been about being busy “making friends for God”, as he puts it.  It was, by any account, a hectic frantic frenetic existence flying from city to city to preach, teach and speak as an itinerant evangelist.  In the latter part of his life, the commitment to evangelism remains, but he also wants to attend to his own heart and to deepen his own friendship with God; he uses the language of paying attention to God’s presence in all things.  This is the prime concern of this book. 
It’s not the usual kind of book that I read, or that the people in my mentoring group might read either.  But  it so happens that Leighton Ford is effectively the grandfather of our group, which has been ‘grandfathered’ out of an original mentoring group assembled by him some decades ago.  So I guess we owe it to him! 
The chapters are structured around prayers of the hours, or the Divine Hours, a cycle of eight prayer times through the day (and night!) in the Rule of St. Benedict.  This medieval monastic order or rule of life, has experienced something of a postmodern renaissance as Christians seek release and a sense of order within the chaotic activity of the pressure and stress-packed technological world.  
In each chapter Ford offers his reflection on the particular prayer in the cycle, provides an exemplar of ‘one who paid attention’ to God, and notes a helpful practice or two for paying attention ourselves.  It is written in an easy first-person narrative style.  Sort of like a fire-side chat with your favourite grandfather, only it is mainly a monologue, and there are bits where you have to work hard to stop, reflect, pay attention to what is really being said... pay attention to what God might be saying. 
I don’t think there can really ever be any replacement to reflecting on the Bible and what God is saying and teaching us through the Scriptures, but I’ve really valued how this book and these kinds of books force me to think and experience things outside the square of my default spirituality.  Like great poetry, of which Leighton is fond, moments in this book catch you unawares, and you are better for it. 

Sunday, May 16, 2010

TEC consecrates practising lesbian bishop

Well, it was always going to happen.

Some of you know that I went to GAFCON - the Global Anglican Futures Conference - two years ago.  It was a massive gathering of people representing the vast majority of the world's Anglicans, who view Jesus as the Son of God who died for the sins of the world, and who combine that faith in Jesus Christ with a high view of the Bible's authority - and who incidentally are still growing by evangelism and conversion.  In other words, they were recognisably Christian using any of the classic historical definitions of the faith.

Contrast the Anglican Church in the USA, otherwise known as 'The Episcopal Church' (which in itself tells us something about their self-superior mindset!).  This article from The Age inaccurately describes Mary Glasspool's 'consecration' as an 'ordination', but otherwise provides a look at the issue. What is at stake here is not just a Church's views on human sexuality, but an entire shift in the meaning of Christian identity - and the source of that identity.

TEC believes that the historic formularies of the Christian faith, including its teaching on the person and work of Christ, the authority of the Scriptures, and human sexuality, are all unfixed and open to change.  They are, to TEC, in a state of progressive change, depending (largely) on the latest reflections from human wisdom and experience.

By contrast, orthodox Christians and Anglicans are committed to the Bible as God's rule of faith, and the source of 'all things necessary for life and salvation'.  The central message of the Bible is 'the eternal Gospel', as unchanging as God is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow.  Yes, the Scriptures are subject to interpretation - that is why we need well trained pastors and teachers who submit themselves to the discipline of biblical studies - but their job is to interpret the meaning and application of the 'faith delivered once for all' to a changing context.

The difference is vitally important. If you put human thinking and reason in first spot, you will inevitably end up moving with the philosophical fashion of the times. But if you put Scripture first, duly interpreted and worked through, there will always be a sense in which you will be 'in the world but not of the world'. It's an uncomfortable spot, but then Jesus Christ did get himself crucified for occupying just such a position.

I've just heard Glasspool speak on the BBC News saying that she invites people who disagree with her to meet with her, for, she says, 'I am a reconciling person'. It's a nice sentiment, but she conveniently ignores the entire history of TEC moving in a direction contrary to numerous discussions and protests dating back more than a decade. She and her Church ignored the Archbishop of Canterbury's strong warning against proceeding with the consecration.  It was hardly a conciliatory move to the rest of the Anglican Church to do so today. We can only expect TEC and its sympathisers to be further marginalised from the rest of orthodox Anglicanism (and to be outraged at the same time).

Other commentators, for those who are seriously interested:
David Virtue
Global South Anglican - a coalition of majority world Anglicans
Anglican TV
Anglican Mainstream -
The Bishop of Tasmania has made a strong comment here and provides more links on his page.

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Surprising Insights - 9 Myths about the Unchurched - Pt II

Myth #6 The pastor must be a dynamic and charismatic leader for the church to reach the unchurched
Only 4% of the churches in the USA meet the definition of evangelistically-effective laid out for this study.  Of these, most of the pastors are not the mega-star ones whose names evangelical Christians would be familiar with.  Pastoral leadership was such an important factor that the entire latter half of the book deals with this.   
Myth #6 We must be careful in our teaching and preaching so that we do not communicate deep and complex biblical truths that will confuse the unchurched
91% of respondents indicated that doctrine was important in their decision to choose the church to join.  Interestingly, this was a slightly higher percentage than the 89% of transfer churched respondents (ie. Christians who transferred their membership).  My observation is that the world is not a simple place, and people - churched or unchurched - are looking for robust and coherent, not simplistic, answers.  
Myth #7 The Sunday School and other small groups are ineffective in attracting the unchurched
By Sunday School the study means the practice of holding Bible study classes on Sunday afternoons, after the morning service.  These often take the place of our mid-week Bible study small groups.  The Sunday School is for all age groups, highly organised, and syllabus driven.  They are, in effect, a means of providing Bible teaching in an organised age-appropriate setting.  An Australian equivalent might be the parachurch Bible Study Fellowship or a Bible overview course run in a local church.  
Myth #8 The most important evangelistic relationships take place in the marketplace
By marketplace the study means the place we spend most of our working time: work, university, school, neighborhoods, shops.  We might spend most of our time in the ‘marketplace’ but it ranks poorly as a fertile place for evangelism. 
When asked who was most significant in influencing their decision to come to church, the formerly unchurched ranked family members highest at 43%.  Next, in order, came ‘No one’ (25%), ‘Other’ (17%), ‘Coworker’ (8%), ‘Neighbour’ (6%) then ‘Merchant’ (2%).  Familial relationships were far and away the most significant.  
Of family relationships, wives were far and away the most significant (35%), children next (18%) then parents (9%) and siblings (5%).  Parents-in-law (2%) and other relations (9%) complete the list.  Husbands barely ranked.  
What this tells us is that marketplace evangelism is extremely difficult for a variety of reasons that we might speculate about.  It also indicates that churches would do well to develop an intentional strategy of equipping wives to evangelise their husbands.  
Myth #9 The unchurched are concerned only about their own needs
The study showed that the motivation of the unchurched for seeking out church or religious influence is complex and varied.  One-in-three respondents indicated that the desire to have religious influence in their children’s lives was the main factor for them.  Many also indicated altruistic motives, the desire to be challenged to make a difference.  
Some preaching tends to denigrate and condemn ‘the world’ and the unchurched, when in reality there is sin both inside and outside the church.  I’ve found that people appreciate it when I point this out in my preaching and teaching, and when I affirm what I can in the world while passionately defending my conviction that Jesus is the pinnacle of all wisdom and altruism and service.
Great MythBusting!  I’m looking forward to the rest of the book!  

Friday, May 14, 2010

Surprising Insights - 9 Myths about the Unchurched - Pt I

Here's a summary of the next chapter in the book. 

Myth #1 Most unchurched think and act like Anglo, middle-class suburbanites with no church background
The study shows that the unchurched are a diverse group, and that people come into church for a variety of reasons from a variety of backgrounds.  We must not fall into the trap of stereotyping the unchurched.  
Myth #2 The unchurched are turned off by denominational names in the church name
Church names rank incredibly low on the range of factors influencing the unchurched to join.  81% of respondents say it did not influence their decision.  8% were uncertain and of the 11% who said the name influence their decision, two-thirds said that the denominational name was a positive influence.  This is probably less true in Australia, but worth investigating further.  If my local church is any guide, there is plenty of local community goodwill and lots of people who have a basically positive view of St Alfred's Anglican Church.  
Myth #3 The unchurched never attend church
On average the unchurched attend around one or two times a year.  The book highlights Christmas and Easter, but we might add baptisms, weddings and funerals as well.  Rainer says, 'Visitors do come - are we ready for them?'  In my experience, this is desperately correct!  Unchurched visitors come to a church for a variety of reasons, not least because someone they trust invites them.

Myth #4 The unchurched cannot be reached by direct personal evangelism
There is plenty of testimony from the interviewees of the impact of a personal visit from the pastor or a visiting team from the church, in which direct evangelism occurred, leading to conversion and their joining the church.  In the majority of stories recorded the visit happened within a month of their visit to the church (and presumably filling out a visitor’s card).  Of course we only hear the success stories - there would have been many failures.  By one calculation only 1 in 5000 who heard Whitfield and Wesley preach were converted.  It is my observation that our contemporary fear of rejection and public shame is the main thing that keeps us from proclaiming the Good News in season and out of season.    



  


Monday, May 10, 2010

How did you learn how to do 'Christian'?

In a recent mentoring meeting with someone, the conversation moved to how we learn how to do 'Christian' as a way of life. How do we learn Christian spirituality, behaviour, cultural norms, prayer, habits of church attendance, singing, speech, etc. etc. etc. etc.?  How did you?

The theological answer, depending on your inclination, is something like 'from church tradition' or 'from the Bible'. The practical answer is often 'from your mentors and peers'. Prayer, for example, is more often 'caught' than 'taught' - we imitate forms and fashions of prayer, rather than practice what we might read in a textbook.

That's why it's one thing to say that prayer is important and ought to happen and even preach it - and quite another to model prayerfulness and to model Scripture-soaked, wise, discerning, effective, humble, entreating, God-glorifying, Christ-centred, Spirit-impassioned prayer.

That's also why it's important to be formed both by the Scriptures and by Scripture-soaked exemplars.

What's true of the school of prayer, is true of the school of Christian living. We learn from the Bible, but we are also formed by the Christians around us. You can't have one without the other.  And both are less than fully effective without the other. So I hope that those of us who are doing 'Christian' have this double commitment in our hearts and minds: to God's Word and God's people.

Friday, May 07, 2010

Surprising Insights from the Unchurched - Introduction

I'm going to offer potted summaries of each chapter as I go along. The point is to present the book as it is, and save my comments and reflections for the end. 


In the Introduction Rainer outlines the parameters of the  research project, which I began to describe in the post below, and provides a high-level summary of findings.  This is the key chart: What factors led you to choose this church?  The percentages are of the total pool of 353 formerly unchurched who were surveyed. 



Pastor/ preaching
___________________________________90%
Doctrines
_________________________________88%
Friendliness of members
________________49%
Other issues
_____________42%
Someone from the church witnessed to me
____________41%
Family member attends
__________38%
Sense God’s presence/ atmosphere of the church
_________37%




Rainer says, "This simple graph alone could speak volumes to a strategy for reaching the unchurched". 


In fact, the study revealed that pastors, preaching and doctrine were such a significant factor that the project went on to interview 101 pastors of evangelistically effective churches.  The entire latter half of the book is devoted to describing these results.  A group of the same number of pastors from 'comparison churches', that is churches that did not meet the criteria of 'evangelistically effective', were also interviewed.  


In a similar vein, a comparison group of 'transfer churched' were also interviewed. These were people who had joined a church, not because of conversion, but from another church.  
I like the methodological premise of the study. It seems to me that to better understand the reasons why people have actually chosen to join is a very fruitful exercise.  And the comparisons with 'transfer churched' and pastors of 'comparison churches' should be extremely interesting.  


At least one person has asked me where they can get this book. If you click on the title above, it will take you to www.bookdepository.co.uk which I'm a fan of: free delivery worldwide, very competitive prices, often the same or better than our local retailers.  

Wednesday, May 05, 2010

Surprising Insights from the Unchurched

I'm currently at home afflicted by a viral bug of some sort, and it's been a good time to catch up with reading, so thanks Dazzur for the loan of this excellent, and for me, un-put-down-able book.

Thom Rainer was founding Dean of the Billy Graham School of Missions, Evangelism and church Growth at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in the US.  He's written interesting and important books on the theme of evangelism & mission - and especially on reaching the unchurched.

This is a simple, but far from simplistic book.  It arises from a series of 353 exhaustive interviews with the recently and formerly unchurched: that is, people who have recently joined the church. Rather than asking what the currently  unchurched think, Rainer samples the opinions of those who have made a recent and successful transition into church membership.

This small methodological tweak yields big results.  So instead of reading another book that gets angry at the church for not reaching group X, Y or Z, I'm reading a book that's about what's happened so that an unchurched person has now become a Christian and committed church member.

I'm already more than half way through the book, but will post reflections as I get to them.  If you'd like to read with me, please get a copy and do so.  I'd love to hear what you think and how we can implement some of these insights in our life together at St Alfs.  (Actually, we've already started to do so through our Mission Action Plan process, but that's another story...)

Tuesday, May 04, 2010

Daily Bible Reading

I've been asked three or four times in the last two weeks about daily Bible reading, how to hear God speaking through the Scriptures, and resources for regular Bible reading.  Here's a one-stop-shop website that has a lot going for it.  http://bible.org/

It has a Daily Reading Plan that you can bookmark and access daily: http://net.bible.org/daily.php and heaps of other resources, including one on women's mentoring which I found quite helpful.

Among its contributors is Darrell Bock, who has written probably the best commentary on Luke's Gospel available today.  It's a two volume monster!  The very model of clear exegesis and application.

Another favourite resource is Don Carson's For the Love of God. It's gone to three volumes, and there's probably a fourth coming soon!  But you can get it FREE from another great web resource: The Gospel Coalition.  You can subscribe to the blog feed via RSS or email, so you can get it emailed to your portable email communications device every morning and read, mark and learn on your way to work.

Happy daily Bible reading!



All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the person of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work. 2 Timothy 3:16-17

What does God think of the BP oil spill?

Christianity Today is a magazine founded by, among others, Billy Graham and Carl Henry in the middle of the twentieth century - just as the evangelical Christianity was beginning its resurgence in the UK and US.  Over the years, it has provided thoughtful and distinctly Gospel-focussed commentary on current events and church concerns.  Here's a latest offering on the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.  It's brief and an overview rather than a sustained argument for a more robust theology of creation, but still worth noting as a conversation starter:

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2010/mayweb-only/28-12.0.html

St Alf's folk might be familiar with Ian Hore-Lacy's excellent little book Sustainable Dominion. Ian has provided a summary here and was on ABC Radio National discussing it here

An important topical topic for Christians to have reasoned, biblical convictions about!

Saturday, May 01, 2010

Shanghai World Expo

When I was in school, one of the values that was drilled into me was, 'If it's worth doing, it's worth doing well'.  China seems to have taken this principle to the max for this expo.


65 BILLION US dollars to showcase Shanghai and China, amazing pavillions from the host country and the UK, Netherlands and Norway - and probably many others besides - and all to be pulled down in October.

What does all this say about world poverty and world priorities?

Our churches are invisible


Thanks Dave. Here's the re-post from your link. 
Our churches are invisible
Archie Poulos
September 4th, 2009
Sydney’s streets are littered with small fridge sized dark brown rectangular boxes positioned between the footpath and the road. Hundreds, maybe thousands of them. They are used by postmen to store mail for distribution. It has only been in the last two years that I have noticed their existence. Up until then they were invisible to me. Now I see them everywhere. 
I wonder whether the same can be said of our churches?
Do people drive past a hundred churches and never notice them? In the past few years I have been on two Moore College Missions where we served coffee on the lawn between the church building and the footpath. On both occasions, in different regions people came up to me and said they thought that the church must be closed. To them the vibrant church life present was invisible.
Possible Reasons
Why could this be the case? 
Here are some thoughts.
1. Church’s busiest time in often Sunday morning well before many people wake up, let alone leave the home. By the time they surface and enter the sunshine, church is over and the building closed.
2. The buildings have been standing longer than passer-bys have been in the area. The church building is just part of the natural geography of the suburb which you take for granted and so ignore. While much change may be occurring inside the building, nothing happens to the external fabric of the building that would make a person think there is any life here or any reason to re-assess the dormant state of the church.
3. There is a generally held community sentiment that churches are a thing of the past, a belief enhanced by the fact that our buildings are often so large and the members so few.
4. For almost all of the 168 hours in a week the church doors are closed.
5. No evidence exists that the church has any engagement with the community. Things that are inactive soon become invisible.

What can be done? 
Here are some thoughts about what can be done. I await your thoughts too.
1. Have something prominent outside your building that changes regularly. The greatest advertising for St. Barnabas’ Broadway was the constantly changing bright sign out the front. No one would have even noticed the building if it weren’t for the sign.
2. Do communal things like morning tea outside.
3. Make a significant, visible change to the exterior of the building.
4. Individuals from church play a significant part in community life. Don’t be afraid to let the community know that you are part of the church family. Perhaps a quality church T shirt or pullover can help?
5. A group from church, properly attired can do something in the community
6. Ring the church bell (sparingly, if you have one).
7. Have welcomers to church stand outside the building, with smiles on their faces; not inside where they can’t be seen.
8. Organise for church members to ‘scoop’ for people by going outside the church grounds and inviting people to the meetings about to commence.
9. Open the doors of the church and conduct history tours.
10. Conduct non-service time meetings on site, so that people may see the building is being used.
11. Regularly provide content about people and photos for the local paper about interesting things your church is doing.

And remember, the goal in all this is not to make our buildings visible, but to connect with those around us so that the message of salvation can be shared.